Presentation Schedule


Presenter Registration Banner 5

Decoding the Meaning of Gemoy as a Political Gimmick: A Semiotic Analysis Approach to Presidential Candidate Prabowo Subianto (84370)

Session Information: Political Science, Politics
Session Chair: Anlin Zhuang

Thursday, 31 October 2024 10:05
Session: Session 1
Room: Room 108
Presentation Type:Oral Presentation

All presentation times are UTC + 9 (Asia/Seoul)

The research focuses on exploring the concept of "gemoy" as a political gimmick in the 2024 Indonesian presidential campaign of Prabowo Subianto. It investigates how this term is strategically used in the campaign's communication to influence public perception and voter behavior. The hypothesis posits that the term "gemoy" serves as an emotional and cultural trigger, designed to generate positive sentiments and support for Subianto, while potentially diverting attention from substantive political discourse. The theoretical framework integrates semiotic analysis, drawing on Charles Saunders Peirce's and Roland Barthes' theories. Peirce's model is employed to understand the components of signs (icon, index, symbol) used in the campaign, while Barthes’ concepts of denotation and connotation help explore the deeper cultural meanings of "gemoy".The methodological approach used was qualitative, which involved a detailed semiotic analysis of the campaign's video advertisements showing the use of "gemoy". Findings reveal that "gemoy" is employed not merely as a term of endearment but strategically to frame Subianto in a light-hearted, approachable manner, which contrasts with the more typical, formal portrayal of political figures in Indonesia. This framing is identified as serving dual purposes: enhancing Subianto's relatability and deflecting critical scrutiny of his political agenda. The term effectively mobilizes emotional resonance and nostalgic affection, which may increase voter engagement and support in the short term. However, the study argues that such strategies, while beneficial for electoral gain, might undermine the democratic process by prioritizing emotional engagement over informed debate on policy and governance issues.

Authors:
Albertus Fani Prasetyawan, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Wisnu Martha Adiputra, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia
Primadita Dian Putri Irnanda, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia


About the Presenter(s)
Albertus Fani Prasetyawan is a master's student in the department of communication science at the faculty of social and political science, Universitas Gadjah Mada, Indonesia.

See this presentation on the full scheduleThursday Schedule



Conference Comments & Feedback

Place a comment using your LinkedIn profile

Comments

Share on activity feed

Powered by WP LinkPress

Share this Presentation

Posted by James Alexander Gordon

Last updated: 2023-02-23 23:45:00